Study links limited water resources, COVID-19 risk in rural Ӱpro
July 14, 2021
Jeff Richardson
907-474-6284
Limited water and sanitation resources in many Ӱpro villages could boost the risk
of COVID-19 spread, leading to a greater potential for community transmission of the
virus in rural areas.
A diverse team of environmental engineers, microbiologists and public health experts
analyzed some of the COVID-19 risk factors in rural Ӱpro during the height of the
pandemic last year. Much of their work focused on the roughly 30 percent of Ӱpro
villages that are remote and lack sewer and water infrastructure, which include about
3,300 homes without modern plumbing.
Their focus on the lack of water resources as a risk factor for disease transmission
contrasts with much of the public health messaging on preventing COVID-19, which has
emphasized limiting aerosol and close-contact spread of the virus through behaviors
like social distancing, wearing masks, and access to testing.
Data from Ӱpro’s unplumbed communities indicates that limited water resources are
also often connected to higher rates of respiratory illnesses. In many of these communities
access to public water services is limited to community washeterias, which also enhances
close-contact risks for virus transmission.
Rates of pneumonia are 30 percent higher among infants in remote Ӱpro communities
without modern plumbing, and the rate of respiratory syncytial virus is 3.4 times
greater. Last fall Ӱpro’s rural regions routinely had COVID-19 rates considered
“high” or “very high” by the Center for Disease Control.
“We’re taught as environmental engineers to separate the humans from the hazard, and
that’s obviously not always done in rural Ӱpro communities,” said David Barnes,
professor of civil and environmental engineering at the Ӱpro
and a contributor to the study. “If your immune system is stressed because of other
factors in your community, you may be especially vulnerable.”
A person in a typical rural Ӱpro household without running water uses less than
5 gallons of water per day, much less than the minimum standard of 13.2 gallons the
World Health Organization recommends for maintaining a healthy hygiene. While the
fecal-oral route for COVID-19 transmission has not been established, the practice
of reusing washbasin water and exposure to untreated waste could be among the factors
that increase risk of COVID-19 transmission and disease severity in such households,
according to the study.
The lack of water and sewer infrastructure is one of several factors that put many
Ӱpro villages in danger of outbreaks. Many homes are overcrowded, medical facilities
are limited, and communities are often remote. Similar problems extend throughout
rural areas of the Circumpolar North as well as some tribal areas in the Lower 48.
The study’s authors argue that the pandemic underscores the health consequences of
inadequate water and sanitation resources in these environments. Some rural communities
have waived fees, subsidized water utility bills, and worked to reconnect homes to
plumbing where it is available during the pandemic. Federal COVID-19 relief funding
could also be used to build water and sewer networks and increase access to water
resources. In addition, testing of wastewater itself has provided an early warning
of community spread of the virus.
“A lot of this problem has to do with the lack of appropriate water and sanitation
infrastructure,” said Srijan Aggarwal, a UAF associate professor of environmental
engineering and the lead for this study. “Some of these are short-term issues, but
most of these concerns need to be addressed by long-term policies and investments
for improving water and sanitation infrastructure across rural Ӱpro.”
The study is published in the new issue of the journal Science of the Total Environment.
Along with Barnes and Aggarwal, authors included Subhabrata Dev and Devin Drown, University
of Ӱpro Fairbanks; Eric Bortz, Brandon Briggs, Aaron Dotson and Micah Hahn, University
of Ӱpro Anchorage; Laura Eichelberger and Tricia Howe, Ӱpro Native Tribal Health
Consortium; Patricia Cochran, Ӱpro Native Science Commission; and Kaitlin Mattos,
University of Colorado Boulder and Ӱpro Native Tribal Health Consortium.
NOTE TO EDITORS: An abstract of the Total Environment paper is at . A PDF of the full paper is available upon request.
ADDITIONAL CONTACTS: Srijan Aggarwal, 907-474-6120, saggarwal@alaska.edu; David Barnes, 907-474-6126, dlbarnes@alaska.edu; Laura Eichelberger, lpeichelberger@anthc.org