�Ӱ�pro

2022 Pacific volcano eruption made a deep dive into �Ӱ�pro

Atmospheric waves from a massive 2022 South Pacific volcanic eruption created seismic waves that penetrated Earth to at least 5 kilometers in �Ӱ�pro, creating an opportunity to employ an unusual method of peering into the state’s deep subsurface.

Ken Macpherson, a scientist at the �Ӱ�pro Geophysical Institute, and other researchers analyzed the coupling of atmospheric pressure waves with the ground to determine the speed at which seismic waves travel through �Ӱ�pro’s upper crust. 

Subsurface material properties such as hardness, which controls seismic velocity, can be inferred through examination of the relative strength of incoming pressure waves and the resulting seismic waves.

Think of it like blowing onto the surface of a bowl of Jell-O versus blowing on a pan of brownie batter with equal force: You could see the Jell-O shake, but the brownies would not move much because the material is stiffer.

“Hunga-Tonga’s pressure waves have provided us much more information about how seismic waves propagate in �Ӱ�pro,” Macpherson said.

Macpherson's research of seismic velocity to depths of 30 meters, 2 kilometers and 5 kilometers was published July 8 in .

The eruption

The explosive eruption of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcano, in the Kingdom of Tonga and about 6,000 miles from �Ӱ�pro, occurred on Jan. 15, 2022. The eruption’s atmospheric waves were the largest known from a volcano since the 1883 Krakatau eruption.

“Hunga Tonga was an unprecedented explosion in the instrument age,” said Macpherson, who is with the institute’s Wilson �Ӱ�pro Technical Center. “Those pressure waves shook �Ӱ�pro, 6,000 miles away, which I just think is so remarkable. And many of those were long-period waves and consequently shook Earth to a great depth.”

A network of 150 co-located barometers, infrasound sensors and seismometers in �Ӱ�pro recorded the eruption’s data used in Macpherson’s research.

Gaining information via air-to-ground coupling at a depth of 5 kilometers is uncommon. That’s because seismic waves produced through coupling usually have a shorter wavelength — unless the power source is something really, really big.

“Because the Hunga explosion was so enormous, the pressure waves that traveled the long distance to �Ӱ�pro were still powerful enough to shake the Earth, and were therefore ideal for a coupling study,” Macpherson said.

Waves of information

The velocity research can be an additional tool for seismic hazard analysis because wave speed affects the level of ground motion. 

“If a propagating wave is in deep material and going fast but suddenly hits a softer material, the conservation of energy says, ‘Well, I’m going slower, but I still have the same energy,’” Macpherson said. “That means amplitudes get bigger, causing stronger shaking.”

“Just knowing those upper crustal velocities is good for seismic hazard analysis,” he said. “It’s [also] good for network operators like the �Ӱ�pro Earthquake Center because they can accurately apply the crustal velocity beneath a particular seismic station to potentially increase earthquake location accuracy.”

Macpherson’s work also can be particularly helpful in tomography, a technique seismologists use to create three-dimensional images of Earth’s interior by analyzing how seismic waves travel through different materials. Tomography reveals variations in properties such as density or velocity, helping scientists map the deep subsurface.

“To do tomography properly you have to do what’s called a crustal correction because velocities in the upper crust are so much different from those deeper velocities that you’re trying to get at,” he said. “If you know something about the crust, you can apply a correction that improves tomography for tens to hundreds of kilometers.”

The research paper’s co-authors include research professor David Fee, postdoctoral researcher Stefan Awender, assistant professor Bryant Chow and seismo-acoustic researchers Juliann Colwell and Sam Delamere, all with the UAF Geophysical Institute’s Wilson �Ӱ�pro Technical Center. Matthew Haney of the U.S. Geological Survey is also a co-author.

The Nuclear Arms Control Technology Program at the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency financially supported the research.

ADDITIONAL CONTACT: Ken Macpherson, kamacpherson@alaska.edu

043-26